A Mughal throne in
Pondoland?
Many years ago, I wrote about the peacock throne and touched
upon this very topic at the tail end of that article. The story has not died
despite the musicologist, historian and Grosvenor investigator Percevial
Kirby’s empathic statement that the ship never really contained the kind of
treasure it seemingly sailed with. Revisiting that story was a thought which had
slipped in and out of my mind for some time now. The other day, I was staring
absently at some of the books in my steadily growing home library over the
years, and I saw the title ‘Caliban’s shore’ which I had purchased during my
Peacock Throne research days. I then got hold of both of Kirby’s books on the
Grosvenor and got to work unearthing the hoax behind this whole thing. So read
on….
The Grosvenor an East Indiaman which sailed out of Madras in
March 1782 destined for English shores, stopped for a few weeks at Trincomalee
in Ceylon and on its home run to England, ran aground into rocks at the ‘bay of
muscles’ on the uninhabited Pondoland coast of South Africa. The ship had a
crew of 132 and 18 passengers (12 adults and 6 children) and substantial cargo.
Of the 123 survivors, only 18 reached Cape Town. A 1783 report on British newspapers
pointed out that the ship’s cargo was valued at around £300,000 signifying the size of
its salvage value. But neither the British Crown nor the EIC did anything to locate
or salvage the ship or track down the survivors. How come?
Numerous stories on the fate of the survivors and the
treasure being carried in the wrecked ship whirled around for many decades
without satisfactory explanations. Many salvage attempts headed by treasure
hunters to get to the sunken ship with a hope of recovering the purported
treasure-trove failed. Was it all a legend, a hoax? Let’s check.
Interestingly, the indomitable Mrs Fay who once wrote about
her confinement by Hyder Ali at Calicut, too had considered sailing on this
trip in the Grosvenor, but could not afford the fare demanded.
Anyway, the ship eventually left a nervous Madras (which had
been waiting for an attack by Hyder Ali any time), with some £60,000
worth coast goods, passenger’s personal wealth worth £65,000 and diamonds worth £10,000,
destined for a 2 month stopover at Trincomalee in Ceylon and from there to
England. The voyage was eventful, the Grosvenor narrowly avoided a sea battle
between the French and British near Ceylon. Two months later, at the break of
dawn on 4th August 1782, the ship stuck an undersea rock off the
Pondoland coastline (some 135 miles north South of Durban) and ended up as a marooned
wreck. The survivors with little food and sustenance decided to trek some 250
miles towards Cape of Good hope, but it did not quite work out as some died and
the remaining survivors drifted into the tribal regions of Pondoland. No real
account of their travails are available, but it is presumed that the surviving
women were taken by the Zulu and the men merged with various tribes in the
region. Three of the surviving white women passengers of the Grosvenor were perhaps
taken as wives by Zulu chiefs. While reports surfaced now and then of seeing
white persons and half castes in black tribes, there was no concerted effort
barring one in tracking them down. It is said that the Abelungu pale faced
Pondoland clan points out that during the 200 or so years some of these survivors
blended with the Zulus.
It was in 1880 or thereabouts, that a man named Sidney
Turner stumbled upon some wreckage and chanced on some gold mohurs and star
pagodas. The press came up with a sensational news to report ‘that the
Grosvenor had much gold bullion on board” which started the stream of treasure
hunts. The next was one Alfred Raleigh who using a medium (a child named Andy) and
hypnosis to divine the wreck, declared that the ship was full of gold and silver.
In 1896, one Alexander Lindsay found some 340 coins. Local kaffirs fanned the blaze
of rumors with their belief that a box of treasure had been buried close to the
wreck when it beached ashore near the mouth of the Tezani River.
In 1905 Lindsay formed a company called ‘the Grosvenor
recovery syndicate’ which brought in a steam winch and a dredger. The story floated
was that the crew departing the wreck had dragged and buried much of the
treasure (some £1,000,000 worth) on land and had drawn the map which this
syndicate had a copy of. Equipment was brought in to bring up the sunken
treasure and the shipwreck which was supposedly covered by mounds of sand. Other
than news of the rusting away of the winch and the dredger Duiker (and a sailor perishing in the attempt) running aground,
nothing was obtained by way of treasure. There was a lull after this event due
to the tragic outbreak of WW1.
It was in 1921 that Martin and David Webster established the
Grosvenor Bullion syndicate floating 700,000 shares, after publishing copies of
the captain’s log and a bill of lading, listing the treasure. The treasure according
to them comprised 19 boxes of precious stones worth £517,000, 720 gold bars worth £420,000,
1450 silver bars, and coins worth £717,000.The value of the wreck was pegged
at £1,714,710
and it was stated that the wreck was just under 18’ of water with 10’ of sand
over it. The promoters claimed that they had a solid plan of boring through the
sea bed to the hull of the submerged ship.
A full 1,000 (or 2,000) shares were purchased by Arthur Conan
Doyle and a letter from him was added part of the company’s prospectus. He said
– ‘Distance prevents me from taking a
more active part in your enterprise, but it seems to me to be approached in a
very workmanlike manner and to offer every prospect of success. . . . There are
obvious risks, but the stake is a large one, and it seems to be a good
speculative venture’.
The scams continued milking greedy investors off their
money. A spurious letter purportedly issues by a port Captain Bowden about the wreck
and unsuccessful attempts of getting to the bullion, lent further credence. Two
years later, perhaps seeing no return or wreck, another share holder even
suggested that Conan Doyle being a spiritualist be asked to divine the location
of the ship. After 8 years of no activity other than digging a hole in the
ground, the company wound up.
It was around this time that a newspaper article came out
stating that the ship had been carrying the two peacocks from the Mughal
peacock throne worth £5,000,000, embedded in concrete and placed in brass
chests. One CBAC Chase mentioned it for the first time in the periodical ‘overseas’
titled ‘the world’s biggest treasure hunt’ in Sept 1921. He stated ‘It is said that in addition to the treasure
actually known to have been in the Grosvenor, were two wonderful golden
peacocks, encrusted with gems, that were parts of the famous golden peacock
throne of Delhi, India.’
The western Argus 13 Mar 1923 declared - Stored in its stronghold were boxes of
emeralds and rubies, bars of gold- specie to the value of considerably, over
half a million, bars of-silver, and other treasure. It was an open secret that
a large portion of the looted Crown jewels of India was on board, chief of
which were the two Golden Peacocks which were valued at an enormous figure.
There is (or -was) over 11 tons of gold aboard, and; today the value of the
treasure is something like £2,000,000.
In Sept 1923 the story was rereleased by the Daily representative
and Free Press to revive interest in the Syndicate. The story went on to say
that the pieces of the throne valued at £5,000,000 finally ended up in Calcutta
and added further mystery by stating that it had in fact been smuggled onto the
ships hold in secret! That was when the story went viral. From a £60,000
manifest, the treasure had ballooned to millions of pounds!!
What about these peacocks? Bernier had previously described
them - The construction and workmanship
of the throne are not worthy of the materials; but two peacocks, covered with
jewels and pearls, are well conceived and executed. They were made by a workman
of astonishing powers, a Frenchman by birth, named..... who, after defrauding
several of the Princes of Europe, by means of false gems, which he fabricated
with peculiar skill, sought refuge in the Great Mogul's court, where he made
his fortune. Tavernier stated - The
underside of the canopy is covered with diamonds and pearls, with a fringe of
pearls all round, and above the canopy, which is a quadrangular-shaped dome,
there is to be seen a peacock with elevated tail made of blue sapphires and
other coloured stones, the body being of gold inlaid with precious stones,
having a large ruby in front of the breast, from whence hangs a pear-shaped
pearl of 50 carats or thereabouts, and of a somewhat yellow water. On both
sides of the peacock there is a large bouquet of the same height as the bird,
and consisting of many kinds of flowers made of gold inlaid with precious
stones.
How about Conan Doyle’s involvement in all this? We do know
he was a shareholder and promoter of the syndicate. Well, as it occurred during
the Boer war at the turn of the 20th century, Arthur Conan Doyle serving for
England in S Africa as a doctor came to hear about the potential treasure. He
added fuel to the fire by remarking in his memories and adventures published in
1924 that the Grosvenor carried the old crown regalia from Delhi! That is how
Delhi got connected to the Grosvenor and now news reports grandly stated that
the Grosvenor treasure included the loot from the sack of Delhi.
He wrote thus, attaching a cryptic picture - Buried treasures are naturally among the
problems which have come to Mr. Holmes. One genuine case was accompanied by a
diagram here reproduced. It refers to an Indiaman which was wrecked upon the
South African coast in the year 1782. If I were a younger man, I should be
seriously inclined to go personally and look into the matter.
The ship contained a
remarkable treasure, including, I believe, the old crown regalia of Delhi. It
is surmised that they buried these near the coast, and that this chart is a
note of the spot. Each Indiaman in those days had its own semaphore code, and
it is conjectured that the three marks upon the left are signals from a
three-armed semaphore. Some record of their meaning might perhaps even now be
found in the old papers of the India Office. The circle upon the right gives
the compass bearings. The larger semi-circle may be the curved edge of a reef
or of a rock. The figures above are the indications how to reach the X which
marks the treasure. Possibly they may give the bearings as 186 feet from the 4
upon the semi-circle. The scene of the wreck is a lonely part of the country,
but I shall be surprised if sooner or later, someone does not seriously set to
work to solve the mystery—indeed at the present moment (1923) there is a small
company working to that end.
But the syndicate collapsed and ceased operation in 1924
after spending some £12,500 leaving behind an incomplete tunnel to what was believed
to be the hull of the Grosvenor.
The legend died down for a while but it was in 1927 that American
millionaire Pitcarin, primarily interested in restoring the peacocks to their
rightful owners (??) acquired the syndicate. He spent £25,000 in efforts but stopped
thereafter for religious reasons! In 1938 the Grosvenor treasure recovery
company was formed and a new story crept in, that Hyder Ali’s treasure worth £3,000,000
was also on board. WWII intervened and interest sagged. It was at this point
that Prof Percival Kirby a renowned musicologist and authority on African music
and races, published his first Grosvenor book which revealed that this was all fantastic
nonsense.
After more hunts and attempts, the throne came back to news
in 1950, 1954 and again in 1957. Prof Kirby published his second book (True
story of the Grosvenor) in 1960 which emphatically rubbished the treasure
stories. Kirby also wrote – I also hope
that in future the rather juvenile legend will be allowed to die, but I fear
that this may not happen. The treasure hunts were finally called off, with the
public no longer believing in the treasure, but well, as you can imagine such
myths and legends do not die.
Percival R. Kirby who passed away in 1970, stated: `undoubtedly the Grosvenor was a richly laden
vessel, but the visions of bullion (if by that is meant hundreds of bars of
gold and silver), and of scores of chests of diamonds, rubies, emeralds, and
the like … are but idle dreams’. Tony Carnie reporting in 2000 concludes succinctly
‘But that's all it was, a legend. An
extravagant falsehood invented to tantalize fortune-seekers to invest in the
Grosvenor Bullion Syndicate Ltd in 1923, along with several other syndicates
and salvage companies formed over the past several decades’.
Interestingly there was one unfortunate soul who did find
some treasure from the Grosvenor. In 1927, a small time prospector named John
Bock found a bunch of 1038 diamonds. The rightful man reported the find, but
was charged under the Diamond trade act for having found locally mined stones and
placed them elsewhere near the Grosvenor wreck (to salt the find). Even though expert’s
stated that these were not South African, pointing to an Indian origin (and thus
the Grosvenor), the diamonds were confiscated and Bock instead of enjoying his
days, counted prison bars for 3 years. What
an unlucky man!
It is time to go back to Delhi and check what happened to the
Peacock throne. As we know the real peacock throne was part of Nadir Shah’s
loot which he took back to Persia. On the way back, he had to battle Afghan and
Kurdish tribes and the throne was ransacked with only a portion of it reaching Persia
eventually. After some years, succeeding Moghul kings built another throne and even
Bahadur Shah used it until he was deposed.
After the Sepoy mutiny and the sacking of Delhi by the
English, this peacock throne was the target and Captain Tytler, the officer
left in charge of the palace, managed to save two of the four pedestals which
supported this platform. Some years after his death, his widow sold one to the
South Kensington Museum. This lady died early in 1908, when Sir Purdon Clarke purchased
the remaining marble pedestal from her estate, for the New York Metropolitan
Museum. The picture shows what can be seen at the museum, but Lord Curzon who spent
years tracing the story of the throne testified that this was not part of the
original peacock throne, but belonged to the later throne.
Back to Port Grosvenor, we see that in 1982 Steve Valentine
a diver in Cape Town discovered a lot remains from the wreck at a location some
600 yards north of where hunters had originally concentrated. A few buckles,
coins and cutlery came up. Archeological excavations on the Grosvenor wreck site
continued since 1999. Small number of rupees, silver coins, gold mohurs,
various artifacts and personal belongings were collected over time. No
treasure, at least not yet!
The legend and the myth of the peacock throne did not die. Sheelagh
Mccay Antrobus takes us back to the legend with a 2010 article mentioning that
the peacocks may have lain hidden in the heart of the Hella Hella Valley near
Richmond. She narrates that before the loot of Delhi by the British, the Shah
tried to avert war by offering the peacock throne to King George III of England.
As the story goes, tribesmen from a remote Xhosa clan found
a big wooden box in the days following the Grosvenor’s sinking and on breaking
it open, found themselves staring at the glittering glory of the Peacock
Throne. It took 25 men to carry it to their chief, who thence sat on it grandly
for many decades.
The neighboring Chaka Zulu chief heard about it and sent 300
men to retrieve it for himself. They defeated the Xhosa in a bloody battle and sped
away with the Peacock Throne through the Hella Hella Valley. As some of them rested
on a hilltop, guarding the Peacock Throne, they saw that their comrades were
being set upon by the remnants of the Bhaca tribe whom they had previously
attacked. The eight Zulus fled with the Peacock Throne, hiding it in a deep
pool on a river before fleeing back to Zululand to request support from the chief
Chaka. But in the intervening period Chaka had been killed and his position
taken by his brother Dingaan. The eight men kept silent about the throne for
they had no allegiance with the new chief. They died and the story should have died
with them, but it did not for one of them had told his great grandson about the
throne. He narrated the story to a farmer named Stone and came to an agreement
that he would show him the location of the throne the next day in return for 11
cows. But in a twist of fate, the Zulu simply vanished the next day, never to be
seen again. Nevertheless, , it seems that a wood carving of the peacock throne dating
back to Zulu times can be seen in a museum somewhere in Zululand, made perhaps
by one of the 8 who buried it.
Another version of this story (50 years of Umko 1966-2016) goes
on to state that Pondo tribesmen found the shipwrecked “Peacock Throne” and
transported it to the local chief’s residence where it was used by him and his
descendants. Around 1828 the Zulu raided the village and found the Peacock
Throne. When the return party reached the vicinity of Hella Hella they left the
heavy throne hidden in a cave. The story goes on like the previous one and now
the grandson of the Zulu is on an expedition back to Hella Hella to find the
treasure. He found the throne stowed away in a large cave, secured to the roof.
But while attempting to take it down the weakened ropes gave way, the heavy
throne fell crushing them to death. So it is still there or somewhere, as the Zulu
surmise, hidden in a cave.
Legends never die, as Kirby concluded…..
If you recall I mentioned about the 25 Indian lascars and
maids on the ship. A Dutch rescue team found 10 of them, 8 lascars and 2 maids
and they were shipped back to India. Unfortunately five of the lascars and one
of the maids drowned on their return voyage when, in a cruel twist of fate, the
ship they were traveling in, the Nicobar, sank, East of Cape Agulhas. The
remaining maid and 3 Lascars arrived at Calcutta, never to tell their tale, in
fact nobody asked them. So there you go, of the 140 who left on the Grosvenor,
only eight Europeans, three lascars and 1 maid made it back home.
What about the Calcutta barrister and emissary of Warren
Hastings, the eminent Charles Newman who was a passenger of the ship and the secret documents which he was
carrying to London? Hastings deputed Charles Newman to Madras to conduct the
inquiry into the alleged corruption of the Company's servants and Newman collected
a lot of information which the EIC did not want exposed. Newman wanted to deliver
these secrets only to superiors in London and that is why he was sailing back
on the Grosvenor. His secrets also died with the Grosvenor mishap for he never
made it out of the Pondoland forests. What could he have found about the 1776
revolution attempt by the Nawab of Arcot? Was he the reason why the EIC did not
bother to track down the ship and its survivors? Was that why the Indians were
never interrogated? That my friends is another mystery waiting to be unearthed.
We’ll see..
References
The Story of the Peacock Throne – Maddy's Ramblings
The true story of the Grosvenor - Percevial R Kirby
Source book of the
wreck of the Grosvenor - Percevial R Kirby
The Great treasure hunts – Rupert Furneaux
Caliban’s shore – Stephen Taylor
Zulu Journey –Carel Birkby
The doctor and the detective – Martin Booth
The Wide World Magazine Vol 50 -The search for the Grosvenor
treasure – EB Dawson
The peacock throne legend -The Witness, 5 Apr 2010 - Sheelagh
McKay Antrobus
Memories and Adventures – Arthur Conan Doyle
Pics: Peacock throne, Grosvenor wreck – Wikimedia, Signs – Conan
Doyle M&A, Throne base (The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 3,
No. 10, Oct 1908)
7 comments:
Hi Maddy - that was delightful. Delightful, and better still, factual. Those Peacock Thrones are still rumoured to be buried somewhere here (I live in Port St Johns).
My question is always: how on earth did the English get it back to India in the first place, to get it / them loaded on the Grosvenor?
I found your blog, because we (my friend Elsa and I) are busy writing a guide to Port St Johns, and am doing a section on treasure hunters at the moment and needed to check on what is in the East London museum from the Grosvenor. Or do the Turners have the chalice, etc? Will check.
I'm going to share it to the Transkei History FB group.
Best regards
Kathryn
Thanks kathryn,
It could very well have been the duplicate throne built after the original was carted away to Iran. Perhaps the EIC officials put it on the Grosvenor at Madras.
Anyway let me know what you find...
The story of peckok Thorne ..it's totaly vholsheet and lie ..trooth are somting alse .no one knows .expect me..nader sah attack dillhi and looting all the trusuer ffrom moghol..that's fine ..I undastand..but how come the Kohinoor came to the uk ???? It's a big masive confferacy.by some of East India company cocompany colonial officer involved.the colonial officer make a plan to take all the valavole goods to USA ..not uk..no one knows. This confferacy..expect me..it's proper planing ..becoze in the est India company mezerety personal was colonial American ..and they are very integrant and very clever ...but .it's unfortunate.yhey are plan was failed...the Grosvenor ship dive some way else ..not in the south coast of Africa ...what re plan ..my god
Nader sah codent took peckok throne..it's a totally folse and vholsheet stroy it's made up story ..it's covering up..I knew where it is ...it's big masive confferacy by east India company some hing rangking officer involvement with the confferacy..the ship driven some way else ..they lie..becoze if that ship found it ..thean all the trooth will be rebuild..
Good Morning,
My grandfather was Martin Luther Webster who was the founder the said syndicate in 1923. i have all the maps, journals, diagrams, bills of lading, photographs, engineering drawings etc. They were left to me by my late mother Maria del Carmen Richardson (ne Webster). Interested in any copies etc.
Sincerley
Martin Richardson
Interesting read - one glaringly incorrect fact though, The Grosvenor didn't sink 135 miles North of Durban. It sank 135 miles SOUTH of Durban. Grosvenor, as the area is now called, is South of Durban, North would be in Zululand. On that point - the assertion that the surviving women were taken by the Zulu is also false and shows a lack of understanding of South Afrucan geography. The Pondoland coast is SOUTH of Durban, and was (and still is) inhabited by Xhosa's, not Zulu's. North of Duban is Zululand, which is nowehere near Pondoland or the shipwreck in this story.
Dave,
the North is a typo has been corrected to South.
Post a Comment