The Lynching of Krishna Menon

Oct 10th - Subedar Ram Singh of 9 Punjab regiment was tired, though relatively young, his lungs were killing him and fear was gnawing deep in his bones & mind. At 14,000 feet, a height his tired body was not accustomed to, pulmonary edema was setting in. He hacked and coughed most of the time, his headaches were severe and his stomach churned. Sometimes his head reeled and he almost collapsed from dizziness, sometimes he had eye bleeds. The cotton clothes and boots he wore were inadequate for the mighty cold of the black Karkoram Mountains and the Namka Chu area. The Lee Enfield 0.303 with its razor sharp bayonet was his only weapon against the well armed Chinese. He had exactly 40 bullets left. He cursed Nehru, Krishna Menon and Gen Kaul, the people he held responsible for sending him and his troops to these miserable heights, to fight an enemy (he had himself shouted Hindi Chini bhai bhai a few months back) unprepared & under equipped, mentally & physically. The Chinese came in hundreds with their AK47’s. His men dropped like flies. The rest of the war at Namka Chu is recorded here.

V.K.Krishna Menon became Defence Minister in 1957 bringing with him a fresh breath of air into a ministry that had been ignored for eight years. Menon fought for his men, improved their pay scales, introduced welfare programs and so on. When Krishna Menon saw the ill equipped condition of the 3.5 million strong army, especially their use of Lee Enfield 0.303 bolt action rifles, World War 1 vintage, he was appaled. He pressed for automatic SLR’s and other defense expenditures to modernize the armed forces. But his detractors would not allow it. Menon again proposed doubling of the officer strength in the army & manufacture of automatic weapons but the proposal was shot down by Gen Thimayya. In 1957, Acharya Kriplani speaking on the Defense Budget in the Lok Sabha said “The mounting expenses on the Army must be cut down. The followers of Gandhi and adherents of universal peace should not increase military expenditure”. It was also a time when the Sterling reserves were down and a monsoon failure plus lack of other resources conspired to ensure that quick arms imports were out of the picture. Menon was forced to start a longer gestating program of indigenous manufacture with Ordnance factories. The grave situation was made even worse by a personal feud between the then Finance Minister Morarji Desai and the Defense Minister Krishna Menon which resulted in an obstructive finance ministry that did not allow the release of essential foreign exchange to buy what little equipment that had been sanctioned.

When Dalai Lama sought asylum in India, after a revolt with the Chinese in 1959, Krishna Menon sensed a deepening gloom. It was only a few years earlier that Menon had worked hard to convince the world that the Chinese should be admitted as a UN member, despite strenuous objections from the Americans ( He had remarked then – China is the elephant in the room, can we avoid it?) and the West. When the Chinese, upset over the Lama’s stay in India & India’s support for Tibetan rebels, started to vacillate on the border issues, Menon was still quietly confident that diplomacy would win the game. Internal politics and rabid sessions in parliament ensured that Nehru had to show decisive action. It had already started with the Bombay elections in 1962 when Kripalani who changed colors conveniently changed his Gandhian non violent tone to - Chini hamla hote hain/Menon Saab sote hain/Sona hai tho sone do/Kripalani ji to aane do. (As China advances, Menon sleeps/Let him sleep if he must/But call Kripalani to be with us).

The Forward policy was being executed in the meantime, and on the other side, the Chinese had completed the road into Tibet through the Aksai Chen plains. Bajpai, Lohia, Kriplani and others were continuously after Nehru to get the Chinese out. On April 11, 1961, Kripalani launched a blistering attack on V.K. Krishna Menon. Under Menon's stewardship, said Kripalani, the same Kriplani who had previously screamed at the increasing defense outlay, "we have lost 12,000 square miles of our territory without striking a single blow”.

The under prepared military was at that point of time undergoing many changes in structure. Following a fight with the opinionated Menon, army chief Thimayya got sidelined. Gen Kariappa resigned, Manekshaw made it clear that he took Thimmayya’s side. Gen Thapar was appointed to replace Thimayya. Nehru was in support of a kinsman GM Kaul. Gen KM Kaul, duly appointed to take over a key position to head IV corps convinced Nehru that the military brass had to act to drive the Chinese away from the NFEA Aksai plains. Menon stated in parliament on Aug 1st that this was going to be a fruitless exercise and that the army would be routed. He tried hard to get his political bosses back to the negotiating table, even starting side discussion with the Chinese negotiators to compromise. Lt. Gen. B.M. Kaul “told Ambassador Galbraith on 16 July that the Indian army viewed the Chinese as set in a ‘mood’ of weakness and that Indian policy was to take maximum advantage of this mood by establishing even more new posts. In contrast to the policy ‘ambiguities’ of a year or two ago, Kaul continued, the Indian army ‘is not now in a mood to be pushed around’.”

Nehru believed that historian Dr Gopal’s opinions on the borders and legality lent more support to India’s claims than China’s, after the Tibetan accession. When China found that Russia were also being supportive of India, they were alarmed and decided to act at an opportune moment, which presented itself in mid 1962 – a period when Russia had taken on USA over the Cuban missile crisis at the Bay of Pigs. To make mattes worse, China infuriated the hardliners in India by discussing the borders with Pakistan. Nehru & the parliament were incensed. Menon who had been wary of the Forward policy tried to reason saying that the army was not trained, resourced or capable of fighting at those high altitudes. Menon explained that India "had not conditioned her reserves for war purposes." The Indian soldiers were fighting at high altitudes without due acclimatization, and had to be air supplied, whereas the Chinese could be easily supplied from the Tibetan table land. Kriplani and others used every opportunity and continued to accuse Menon of not driving the Chinese out and wasting time.

Kaul and his boss Thaper argued that it was possible to unseat the Chinese. Menon vainly suggested that the air force be used, Nehru refused outright stating that this would escalate the conflict to a full war fearing the might of the Chinese air force (which were of Russian origin but were actually grounded due to lack of spares – The Russians were delaying spare part supplies, this was only known much later). The IB & Ambassador Panickkar stated that the Chinese may not retaliate by land, but could with their air force. Nehru chose to satiate public opinion. With that Menon’s diplomacy ideas collapsed. On Oct 11th, it was actually decided that the soldiers would stay put and hold their lines. However on Oct 13th, much to everybody’s surprise, Nehru announced to the press in Colombo that India would act to drive out the Chinese from the Aksai plains.

Nehru informed the journalists that the advantage lay with India in NEFA, and by that time, this belief had become an accepted truth in India. Menon then suggested that India take on the Chinese in the plains but he was ridiculed again in parliament as supporting the Chinese. Menon explained that it would be strategically better to "let (the Chinese) come into Indian Territory in depth before giving them a fight." Eventually, he and Nehru consciously went against the strategic advantage to mollify an uninformed and shallow "public opinion."

Contrary to public opinion, Menon was not cozy with Gen Kaul. Kaul was Nehru’s man. In fact Kaul even went on leave during Sept 1962 (Debacle to revival – RD Pradhan) to protest differences of opinion with Menon. But Kaul, who was heading Operation Leghorn was by certain accounts not the right person, in the sense that he had no combat experience. He also had the reputation as being cozy with the press at a time when Menon had given orders not to document or discuss any secret meetings. Kaul who visited NEFA to oversee action, fell ill on Oct 18th and came away to Delhi!! Much through those days, Kaul communicated directly with Nehru (Greater game by David van Praag).

The Chinese attacked on Oct 20th, and the Indian army fought valiantly on some fronts, but retreated in others. The defeat was demoralizing. The parliament was in uproar, the press and the public were baying for Nehru’s and Menon’s blood. Krishna Menon, Nehru’s right hand and confidante, was the favorite whipping boy of the media, even as the poison arrows were directed against the prime minister himself. On October 23, the Congress charged Menon for having misled Nehru, Parliament and the country. On October 31, Nehru took over the Defense portfolio as Menon continued in a new post in the Cabinet as a Minister for Defense Production. Days later, on Nov 9th, Menon resigned and left active politics. The Chinese war lasted 30 days. As critics commented later, India spent 18 days trying to drive out Menon, the scapegoat, from the defense ministry (Sankar Ghose – Nehru Autobiography)

As defense minister, Menon was responsible for many of the failures. Amongst the guilty, next to Nehru, Menon and the military leaders, was the Opposition. They were largely responsible for pushing Nehru into a corner and forcing him to fight the Chinese at the wrong time and place. Nor can they escape responsibility for ignoring the defense needs after 1959. Another issue was that Menon blindly followed the thesis as propounded by Nehru that there was no threat to India's external security. Menon was unfortunately a pacifist, not cut out for the role of a war leader.

Lakshmi Menon, Nehru’s roving Ambassador, Deputy Minister (external affairs) & parliamentary secretary (also a Krishna Menon critic) sums this up perfectly – quoting a rare outburst from Menon against his friend Nehru, in Sept 1962. He told Lakshmi “Now my enemies will attack me, but I cannot reply because Nehru was personally responsible for all decisions regarding the NEFA and had refused to concentrate as much force there as in Ladakh”. (Source - CIA files)

Krishan Menon said after resigning his post– “I do not feel that I have the right nor will my sense of propriety allow me to go into details of that period because, as a minister, when I resigned, I had the opportunity to make a statement, but I did not, and it was not a lapse. I refused to do that deliberately. I abstained for reasons that I set out in the resignation letter of Nov 9th when I said I should not say anything that would help the Chinese, anything that might reflect on my colleagues in the government, anything that might affect the position of the government as a whole. I regret neither my resignation nor my silence. I hope I shall maintain this position even under provocation” - and he maintained that silence until his death. (Source- VKKM Bio by Madhavan Kutty)

I will stop with this poignant note - On Oct 25th, Ambassador Galbraith wrote to President Kennedy stressing that India will soon ask for military aid – “Does important American assistance require his (Menon’s) effective elimination from the defense & UN scene?” Galbraith was advised as follows from Washington – “We again urge the importance of avoiding the slightest appearance of US initiative and responsibility in removing Menon” (S Mahmud Ali – Cold war in the Himalayas).

Nehru was a broken man after the affair; he died soon after, in 1963. Menon left the big arena; Morarji continued on, restored relations with China, later got embroiled in a case involving the CIA & S Hersh. Kaul & Thimmaya wrote books for posterity, Manekshaw continued with the Army & rose to the position of Field Marshall. The organizations started by Menon flourished and produced a fine backbone of support to the Indian Armed forces. The Air force always featured in future wars. As for the 0.303 rifles, unfortunately, they are still being used by state police departments in India and will someday be replaced with automatic rifles.

Menon was at times an abrasive and caustic person, who irritated and annoyed many. But he always supported his good friend Nehru, blindly. Narrating his own experience of cabinet meetings, Krishna Menon states that Nehru would sometimes say, "Here it is, let's agree on this", that usually at the end of the meeting he would mumble that everyone was agreed and that he was not a person who sought consultation." (The making of India’s foreign policy – J Bandhyopadhyaya). Nehru & Menon were above all, friends in need and friends indeed, they were always fellow travelers.

But despite his many weaknesses, Menon held his country’s interest utmost and worked ceaselessly for it. As R Murali Kumar wrote to the editor of Time - Those were the days when true patriots took part in the development of the nation and there were no linguistic, cultural or other factors, which decided one's victory in the elections. In 1967, Bombay’s Shiv Sena (SK Patil) targeted Krishna Menon (during Menon’s electoral bids to get back into parliament), from Mumbai for his "rhinoceros"-colored skin. Film actor Dilip Kumar was branded a Pakistani spy for supporting Menon.

Subedar Ram Singh survived the war, I saw him last week and ate an excellent Garlic Nan and Chicken Makhani served by him. Thin and gaunt, he still blames the Indian political masters. I wish I could sit and explain all this to him, someday. But geopolitics is always best understood, by mere mortals like us, only in hindsight. Perhaps Menon could foresee the calamity – it was he who once said - 'It is the habit of mediocrity to complicate a simple issue. It is the mark of genius to simplify a complex one'.

Today – I saw on TV & read this article – People prefer Chinese made Idols to Indian versions, they were cheaper & better made. Last year, when I visited Calicut, a place where Menon lived his younger days, I saw a Chinese bazaar doing roaring business, with deals like 10 batteries or bulbs for Rs10 and things like that. The Indian eye for a bargain meant that they were quickly purchased. NAM & Panchsheel were worn out usages, long forgotten. The 62 debacle was forgotten & globalization was fast taking root.

Authors note – I have read many a book on Menon, many a newspaper article of that time, MI5 files on Menon, CIA reports of the Sino China war and only some of what I read finds its way here. It is in no way an authoritative or complete account of events leading to or during the 62 war. This article is only a feeble attempt at explaining the general outlook at that time and a small defense for Menon, for there are far too many people who blindly repeat falsehoods against Menon without even knowing him.



Previous blogs on Krishna menon

An undiplomatic diplomat
The reluctant politician

Krishna The movie

Comments

Guru said…
I do not believe any MI5 and CIA files. MI5 for a long time in 1950s was smarting from Kim Philby defection and CIA those days was a one man show, Allen Dulles ran it as his empire. He had his brother's support- John Foster Dulles, in whose name the Washington DC main airport is named, was Secretary of State, ran the Eisenhower's administration for years as the President frequently became ill and Richard Nixon the VP was a light weight then. The Dulles brothers were the most powerful then and the elder, John Foster Dulles created SEATO and CENTO, put Pakistan in it because that country was used for spying missions over Russia. This pushed Nehru towards Russians and Chinese. Nehru a left-wing intellectual had his soul mate Menon. Michael Foot,a friend of Menon in India League days (Menon was for a time a member of British Labour party and a municipal councillor Camden ), who later became deputy PM of Britain in James Callghan govt in n1970s , said to us in an informal gathering that Menon was Nehru's creation.

About Nehru, Menon , parliament and president Radhakrishnan. Nehru dominated Indian Parliament like a colossus, and brushed aside any opposition. He never fired any of his cabinet members directly but used a secondary route to get rid of them. Soon after Chu Enlai visit to India, still shouting the friendship, panchsheel etc.. the Chinese it appeared preparing to take Tibet. Many forget that Chairman Mao was still alive then. There was no way poorly equipped Indian army would have repelled the vastly outnumbered and better equipped Chinese. Tibet was in a limbo status as a protectorate within Chinese influence for centuries. China could have taken it any time.

I have a personal interest here. Three of my engineering college mates became commissioned army officers and were sent to the Tibetan borders soon after. one did not return, two were seriously injured-one of them later became a major general.

When Tibet was overrun, parliament became agitated, and the shame of losing territories weakened Nehru hands. But Menon's demeanour never fitted his role as a defence minister or his role as a roving ambassador. He created enemies and they were waiting. They ranged from American Administration with whom Menon had ideological clash to British government headed by McMillan , the Conservative Party member and a protege of Churchill who never liked the bed fellows of Labour Party.

I was glued to AIR and read papers avidly then. The whole country felt the shame, opposition was merely shouting without substance and President Radhakrishnan's address was clothed in criticism and Menon was on borrowed time. Ditherer Nehru used all these reasons to get rid of Menon, eventhough the main architect of India's shame was himself.

Menon was not lynched,he hanged himself with the long rope of his demeanour.
Guru said…
Just an additional piece about Menon.

Menon brought an Iyer cook from Tamil Nadu for his India League in London. Later this cook opened an Indian eatery in London, and about 20 years ago, when I had my lunch there he said a few things about Menon.

When Menon left India League and succeded Vijayalakhmi Pundit as Indian High Commissioner to Britain thanks to Nehru, he still used the Iyer cook who was literally next door in India League. Iyer thought that Menon should have stuck with his local councillorship in Camden. Iyer said had Menon remained in the Labour Party even after Indian independence(after all he was close to Atlee and Stafford Cripps, was a friend of Aneurin Bevan and Ernest Bevin) Atlee would have found a place in his government for later years. What Iyer said still lingers in my ears' Menon spent his adult life in London,though his heart was Indian, his mind was that of Leftist English intellectual. Was illsuited to work in India after his time here in London and was particularly not suited for the roles Nehru gave him'
Vivek Kumar said…
Hi,

Great blog.. and a fantastic series of posts on VKKM.

A request: could you please enable full feeds for your posts?
Naveen said…
Your defence of Menon is fullly justified......
Certain points which struck me while reading this post are :-
1. We lost in 1962 primarily because the decisions were infulenced by political perception rather than sound military logic ...
2. Being Nehru's kin was what qualified Gen Kaul to command a corps in battle ... otherwise he was an officer from the supply corps and lacked experience of commanding a field formation .... moreover he presided over most of the battle from a hospital ward in delhi, without any knowledge of facts on ground ....

3.We had strong and resolute generals like Thimmaya, Cariappa and Manekshaw in those days, who refused to accept wrong decisions from their political bosses ... i am sure we have leaders of such calibre today ..... the political scene is nopt even worth comparing ....

4. Our policies have always lacked vision and purpose or have been inconsistent with realities .. then & now ...i only hope that we don't falter again, because the chinese definetly are upto something on the arunachal front ..
Guru said…
Just a last word about Tibet an the so called turmoil.

As an young man then I too was agitated about China's occupation , then I thought was 'illegal'. It was good for India to give sancuary to Dalai Lama. As Shakespeare said 'sweet are the uses of adversity', in exile Dalai Lama has become a world figure, a stature which he would not have achieved had he stayed in an obscure patch called Tibet. For India in the 21st century, working with China in a cooperative way should take priority as the latter will be a major power in the middle of this century. India surely cannot have enemies all around its perimeter. Spitting at China does not help. Tibet will never be an independent country again, nor will be a country where Buddhism is freely practiced. Tibet was never an independent entity in the strictest sense for centuries.

Instead of sloganising about human rights, inviting wrath and hatred from China, the best option for India and those who support Dalai Lama is to officially acknowledge Dharmasala and territory around it as Dalai Lama's autonomous habitat, and move on. After all through Dalai Lama, Buddhism arrived back to the country where it belonged. India needs China as a friend not as a foe.
harimohan said…
dear maddy
there is history in this post ,the link on namka chu battle was excellent ,these should be included in the education curriculum so that our young know our past and how our leaders have steered our country ,
kargil was again a repeat wasnt it ?
our defence forces have never been truly appreciated for thier valour in spite of thier odds ,
incidentally i was at the memorial built for the battle of namka chu near tawang when i made a trip to arunachal pradesh ,a beutiful place .
great post maddy ....
Guru said…
With the benefit of hindsight, could Thimmaiah or Manekshaw or Cariappa have done any better? For a start, they had no experience of fighting the Chinese. The problem was not only concerning readiness and logistics but gross misunderstanding of Chinese battlefield tactics. That was the view of my two friends, who were wounded when their brigade was easily overrun by the Chinese. They said the Chinese came at them in several waves as if half of Chinese population was confronting them in turn!! Chinese used overwhelming manpower to beat Indians back to where they came from. In this situation, without a very strong air support, my friends said weapons, ammunitions and equipment on the ground would have made very little impact.

It was Eisenhower who realised a few months after Normandy invasion that fighting Germans in Normandy beaches and Caen was one thing, but fighting them at the German borders is another. Indians were fighting Chinese in their borders and in unfamiliar terrains,ill-equipped, ill-prepared and with illusion. The outcome should not have surprised the men in power at that time.

Given Tibet's chequered history, there was ineveitability about this happening, and men in Gandhi caps-the political masters sadly did not foresee it.
Maddy said…
Thanks Naveen, Hari and Guru

Your comments have been wonderfully stimulating. Let me make some remarks

I referred to MI5 and CIA comments as two sides had to be presented. These two were detractors & Menon critics. As for Nehru, I had no desire to lay blame on him as matters between him and Menon were never recounted by Menon himself in or as defense (for that was how deeply Menon valued his friendship with Nehru), so we do not know, but the intent was only to try & provide perspective to those who have always blamed only Menon for the debacle. The opposition parties should also have taken a major part of the blame, especially Kriplani and his merry team…but well they did not and will not.

Guru – your comments about Menon’s ‘Englishness’ are on the dot. That was a big problem with his Indian career, something the opposition always mentioned & took mileage on. He was as you said a creation of Nehru and forced into the Indian scene at the fierce insistence of Nehru. He was as I said earlier, a reluctant minister,politician and an undiplomatic diplomat.

Naveen – remember that in the days leading to the war there was a lot of infighting in the defense ministry & the armed forces as well. The army brass was sulking since they did not have their way and spent considerable time shadow fighting Menon & posturing. Military logic & strategy- that we can overrun the Chinese actually came from the generals I have listed, not Menon. They did not push Nehru for air support or agree with Menon to take the Chinese on the plains. Today they all lay blame on the DM. I am not so sure Thimayya & Cariappa were resolute generals who got their voices heard, but that is another topic by itself.

Guru – What Dalai Lama said on Wednesday is the following, much in line with what you stated – He said ‘We must build good relations with the Chinese, we should not develop anti Chinese feelings. We must live together side by side’. That being the official stand of Tibet I guess, we better leave them be to sort it out between themselves.
Maddy said…
vivek - i can turn on the full feed, but is it a good idea? my posts are not necessarily short..
Vivek Kumar said…
Long posts are fine in feeds, I think. It is not as if you write 10 long posts every day and readers would be pained by having to scroll down to find something they want. Bring them on :)
narendra shenoy said…
Great post. I had always dimly thought of VKKM as an abrasive ivory tower intellectual responsible for the '62 debacle out of sheer cussedness. My view stands revised and greatly clarified. Also, Guru's comments were great.
indiaunfinished said…
A terrific find. Passionate post, thoughtful blog. Gratefully bookmarked!
G Saimukundhan said…
Lot of what is posted on this page, and the feedback through the comments section, is honestly news to me. What I really admired the most in this post, is the level of maturity and articulation exhibited in the interactions. Am impressed! Not that I am great blogger or writer or any other person of any eminence, I am plainly impressed.

Most of the blog posts on sensitive issues and responses that I come across ends up becoming a ego clash. I am pleasantly surprised to find a welcome departure.

Hopefully I will visit your pages more often.

Cheers
Maddy said…
Thank you very much Saimukundhan...
Velamur Anand said…
A different perspective:

(a) The roots go to the artificial partition of India in 1947 engineered by the british. Worst part of it is that these brits were a worthless lot, proving their toothlessness by running away from the germans at Dunkirk and from the Japs at singapore.Churchill prevented a national govt in India in 1942 and US President Roosevelt even threatened him with breaking the wartime alliance if due to Churchill's obstinacy, there was no national govt in India and the Japs made inroads. Churchill lied about India to Roosevelt and allowed Japs to control southeast asia and to slaughter American soldiers and sailors without let or hindrance. China, US and SOviet Union all three supported a national govt in India, to no avail. (We must remember this. Chinese leader Chiang kai sheik's wife came to India and met Nehru and other leaders in 1942-43.Arun Shourie in his book-length diatribe against China says that was Chiang's Kuomintang, not the communiust party of China. Actually at that time, communists of Mao had a United front with Chiang to fight the Japanese. So the Communists of China also contributed to the pressure on Britain to concede a national govt in India)

(b) Russia won WW2 for britain and the world. Wavwll, the viceroy, had been appointed by a defeated Prime Minister, Churchill and represented a country saved by the Russians,. he was doubly a lameduck viceroy. Still, we negotiated with him and surrendered to the creation of pakistan.

(c) By and large, over history, Tibet has been ruled as part o China. It was British colonials who intrigued to make the dalai Lama their puppet. No Indian was involved in these games; in the 1900s , there was not a single officer in the Indian Army who was an indian.There was a surveyor. sarat Babu das . who went to tibet in 1902 and who wrote that Tibet is part of China.In 1936, in China's weakest moment, Brits sent a political officer, to Lhasa, an ICS officer called Hugh richardson.

(d) One of the problems at Independence was what to do with ICS officers, british as well as Indian, many of whom had misbehaved with the people. It was agreed to ascertain their willingness to continue to serve and after screening, there would be application of mind to decide on theeir continuation. Madras was the noblest province which sacked several ICS officers on morning of 15th august 1947. Unfortunately, elsewhere, like Bengal and the centre, there was too much chaos and this was not implemented. Hugh Richardson continued till August 1950 as Political Officer in lhasa. He kept up a barrage of misinformation that Tibet enjoyed "de facto independence for last 11 years " . Another ICS officer, Sir Girija Shankar Bajpai, fed this onward to sardar patel . Unfortunately, public opinion in India came to believe this myth. True to his worthless countrys habit, Richardson ran away from Lhasa one month before the Chinese army came. He had taken his oath of office to serve the King of Englnd, and felt he owed loyalty only to Britain.

(d) We dont mind annoying China by allowing dalai lama to intigue with West but we are most diplomatic in dealing with a butcher of 40000 tamils like rajapakshe.

It is time people in India remembered the way it happened. This loudmouth Kripalani, who could wax eloquent on "Menon loising 12000 sq miles " was leader of Congress in Sind in 1946. Muslim League govt in Sind faced a no confidence motion in the assembly. It was saved by a single vote of a "European " member nominated by the governor. Kripalani did nothing. He cud hv at least gone on hunger strike at this foreigner meddling in India's affairs. If ML had lost its govt in Sind, it wud hv also lost its govt in Bengal and there would have been not a single provincial govt of the ML.Jinnah wud have n
been weakened and India wud hv been saved.
Velamur Anand said…
A different perspective:

(a) The roots go to the artificial partition of India in 1947 engineered by the british. Worst part of it is that these brits were a worthless lot, proving their toothlessness by running away from the germans at Dunkirk and from the Japs at singapore.Churchill prevented a national govt in India in 1942 and US President Roosevelt even threatened him with breaking the wartime alliance if due to Churchill's obstinacy, there was no national govt in India and the Japs made inroads. Churchill lied about India to Roosevelt and allowed Japs to control southeast asia and to slaughter American soldiers and sailors without let or hindrance. China, US and SOviet Union all three supported a national govt in India, to no avail. (We must remember this. Chinese leader Chiang kai sheik's wife came to India and met Nehru and other leaders in 1942-43.Arun Shourie in his book-length diatribe against China says that was Chiang's Kuomintang, not the communiust party of China. Actually at that time, communists of Mao had a United front with Chiang to fight the Japanese. So the Communists of China also contributed to the pressure on Britain to concede a national govt in India)

(b) Russia won WW2 for britain and the world. Wavwll, the viceroy, had been appointed by a defeated Prime Minister, Churchill and represented a country saved by the Russians,. he was doubly a lameduck viceroy. Still, we negotiated with him and surrendered to the creation of pakistan.

(c) By and large, over history, Tibet has been ruled as part o China. It was British colonials who intrigued to make the dalai Lama their puppet. No Indian was involved in these games; in the 1900s , there was not a single officer in the Indian Army who was an indian.There was a surveyor. sarat Babu das . who went to tibet in 1902 and who wrote that Tibet is part of China.In 1936, in China's weakest moment, Brits sent a political officer, to Lhasa, an ICS officer called Hugh richardson.

(d) One of the problems at Independence was what to do with ICS officers, british as well as Indian, many of whom had misbehaved with the people. It was agreed to ascertain their willingness to continue to serve and after screening, there would be application of mind to decide on theeir continuation. Madras was the noblest province which sacked several ICS officers on morning of 15th august 1947. Unfortunately, elsewhere, like Bengal and the centre, there was too much chaos and this was not implemented. Hugh Richardson continued till August 1950 as Political Officer in lhasa. He kept up a barrage of misinformation that Tibet enjoyed "de facto independence for last 11 years " . Another ICS officer, Sir Girija Shankar Bajpai, fed this onward to sardar patel . Unfortunately, public opinion in India came to believe this myth. True to his worthless countrys habit, Richardson ran away from Lhasa one month before the Chinese army came. He had taken his oath of office to serve the King of Englnd, and felt he owed loyalty only to Britain.

(d) We dont mind annoying China by allowing dalai lama to intigue with West but we are most diplomatic in dealing with a butcher of 40000 tamils like rajapakshe.

It is time people in India remembered the way it happened. This loudmouth Kripalani, who could wax eloquent on "Menon loising 12000 sq miles " was leader of Congress in Sind in 1946. Muslim League govt in Sind faced a no confidence motion in the assembly. It was saved by a single vote of a "European " member nominated by the governor. Kripalani did nothing. He cud hv at least gone on hunger strike at this foreigner meddling in India's affairs. If ML had lost its govt in Sind, it wud hv also lost its govt in Bengal and there would have been not a single provincial govt of the ML.Jinnah wud have n
been weakened and India wud hv been saved.
Yash Kinjalk said…
Velamur anand .....great!